Friday Five: Social Media In Moscow

April 9th, 2010 View Comments


Two deadly explosions in Moscow metro became the main theme in the Runet (Russian Internet) on March 29, 2010. The blasts occurred during the morning rush hour in central Moscow. The first was at the Lubyanka metro station (7:50 am), the second came 40 minutes later at the Park Kultury station.

Social media in this extreme situation appeared to be much faster than traditional media. But despite the activity and efficiency, it also became a source of panic and misinformation as well.

This Friday Five discusses the positive and negative aspects of social media’s role in the attack response.

40 Tweets per second

The tragedy in Moscow metro has become an example of how news now moves much faster than traditional media often allows: “40 Tweets per second on the terrorist attacks in the Moscow metro vs. only 4 TV newscasts in the morning” via @krassnova. People were very active in sharing the information from the places where the tragedy took place. While the Twitter user base in Russia is not very large at only 183 thousand users, everyone including TV channels and the Russian government saw Twitter’s value.

Check what you RT

As good as Twitter was at facilitating quick transmission and response, it also spread rumors and unverified facts. The information sometimes appeared to be incorrect or without links to sources. Twitter was full of rumors such as ”I’ve heard that another explosion occurred at another metro station“ or ”Officials don’t speak about the new explosions, why?!“. Thousands of retweets of unchecked information created significant panic among users.

Hashtag: Real Help – Real Spam

People used Twitter to lend a helping hand by encouraging blood donations or appealing to car owners to drive people from the metro and bring them to their destinations for free (as opposed to using taxi drivers who raised the prices for their services). To make these efforts easier to follow and coordinate, Twitter members used hashtags like #metro29 and #moscow. At the same time, however, some unethical marketers used these hashtags for spam and advertising, taking advantage of the high levels of interest.

Lack of Control

Videos and photos that people gathered and placed on their blogs inspired passionate debates about the ethical aspects of posting the pictures of victims without the permission of their relatives. Moreover, such content was posted and distributed uncut among unprepared users. The lack of editorial control shocked people.

Mr. President on Twitter

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is going to launch his official microblog on Twitter in the near future. In related news, the Presidential Administration sent an official notification to the administration of Twitter with request to remove the fake Medvedev account, which was very active during the Moscow metro terrorist attack.


Olga Rasulova
Edelman Digital, Moscow
Follow on Twitter @olkarose

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: ,


  • Veselina Pavlov Buie
    Thanks for sharing these great insights, Olga.

    What struck me about your observations is that Twitter in this case mirrored very closely how information spreads in the physical world via word of mouth around disasters.

    Having lived through the Sept 11th attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and run from the clouds of ash & debris as the South Tower collapsed, I can tell you first hand that the rumors, exaggerations and scamming were very similar. There were reports that there were 11-13 hijacked airplanes, rumors of additional targets in New York City and elsewhere and price gouging for basic services in the immediate viscinity of the World Trade Center. There were also countless amateur photographers and videographers capturing the unfolding disaster. Many of the photos were ultimately compiled into a digital (and hard copy) archive: http://hereisnewyork.org/gallery/book.asp

    I've read similar accounts from the sarin gas attacks on the Tokyo subway (http://bit.ly/aegWfy).

    In some ways, it's good to know that Twitter reflects our real & very human reactions in difficult times. But as you point out, it's important to remember the challenges that these sorts of real-time man-on-the-street reports present in tracking breaking stories that are also quite emotional.

    It would be interesting to know how soon after the intial reports the accurate story of that day's events emerged on Twitter, as the broader community worked to correct the misinformation.
blog comments powered by Disqus